Women’s Health

Isoflavones Deserve More Attention for Their Effects on Hot Flashes

By September 1, 2016 No Comments
Download PDF

There is good reason to encourage clinicians to recommend isoflavones for women who experience hot flashes and wish to avoid hormone therapy, despite the limitations of research, as noted below.

Isoflavones may be more potent than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) at alleviating menopausal hot flashes. That was the conclusion of a group of Chinese researchers following their extensive evaluation of the clinical research.1  After deducting placebo effects, isoflavones reduced hot flash frequency by 25% compared to slightly less than 14% for SSRIs. In fact, isoflavones were even more beneficial than two drugs used to treat hot flashes,  gabapentin and clonidine, which reduced frequency by 14.8% and 18.5%, respectively.

Although SSRIs are generally prescribed for treating depression, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved Brisdelle™ (Noven), which contains 7.5 mg of paroxetine, a SSRI, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.2

Brisdelle™ was approved by the FDA on the basis of two trials which enrolled 1,184 women3  and found that hot flashes were reduced by an average of 1 to 2 per day in women who had at least 10 hot flashes per day at enrollment.2   In 2012, a meta-analysis by Taku et al.,4 which found isoflavones significantly alleviated hot flashes, involved 1,196 women.  Hot flash frequency and severity were reduced by about 21% and about 26% beyond the placebo effect, respectively. The benefits were seen in women regardless of their initial hot flash frequency. Therefore, the sample sizes of isoflavones and paroxetine are similar, and isoflavones reduce symptoms to a similar or greater extent.

But isoflavones have not been widely embraced by clinicians for this purpose and there may be several reasons for this.  One is that many of the initial literature reviews, and even some later ones, failed to conclude that isoflavones are efficacious.  Unfortunately, these findings were misleading since these reviews didn’t sub-analyze the data according to the genistein content of the isoflavone supplement.

Trials intervening with isoflavone supplements rich in genistein were about twice as potent as supplements low in genistein.  Trials have typically intervened with supplements of genistein only, or supplements derived from whole soybeans or derived from the hypcotyledon portion of the bean.  In whole-soybean-derived supplements, genistein represents about 50% (similar to soyfoods) of the total isoflavone content whereas in the hypcotyledon-derived supplements genistein represents only about 10%. Thus, it’s to be expected that these studies would yield different results.

In addition, many health professionals and clinicians formed an opinion about the safety of isoflavones on the basis of rodent studies beginning in the late 1990s that showed isoflavones stimulate the growth of existing estrogen-sensitive tumors in ovariectomized athymic mice.5  Fortunately, perspectives are changing with publication of extensive clinical data showing isoflavones don’t adversely affect markers of breast cancer risk6-13 and prospective epidemiologic data showing post-diagnosis soy intake reduces recurrence.14  The recent conclusion of the European Food Safety Authority that isoflavones don’t adversely affect the breast tissue of postmenopausal women should help in this regard.15

Finally, unlike the research of Brisdelle™, which involved two large trials using the same preparation, trials using isoflavones were relatively small and used a variety of soy extracts.  Consequently, while collectively the data are impressive, no individual soy extract has been extensively studied.  On the other hand, this could actually enhance the case for efficacy because the results come from so many different laboratories and from so many different isoflavone-containing products.


  1. Li L, Xu L, Wu J, Dong L, Zhao S, Zheng Q. Comparative efficacy of nonhormonal drugs on menopausal hot flashes. European journal of clinical pharmacology. 2016.
  2. Orleans RJ, Li L, Kim MJ, et al. FDA approval of paroxetine for menopausal hot flushes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1777-9.
  3. Simon JA, Portman DJ, Kaunitz AM, et al. Low-dose paroxetine 7.5 mg for menopausal vasomotor symptoms: two randomized controlled trials. Menopause. 2013;20:1027-35.
  4. Taku K, Melby MK, Kronenberg F, Kurzer MS, Messina M. Extracted or synthesized soybean isoflavones reduce menopausal hot flash frequency and severity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Menopause. 2012;19:776-90.
  5. Hsieh CY, Santell RC, Haslam SZ, Helferich WG. Estrogenic effects of genistein on the growth of estrogen receptor- positive human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res. 1998;58:3833-8.
  6. Hooper L, Madhavan G, Tice JA, Leinster SJ, Cassidy A. Effects of isoflavones on breast density in pre- and post-menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:745-60.
  7. Wu AH, Spicer D, Garcia A, et al. Double-blind randomized 12-month soy intervention had no effects on breast MRI fibroglandular tissue density or mammographic density. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2015;8:942-51.
  8. Hargreaves DF, Potten CS, Harding C, et al. Two-week dietary soy supplementation has an estrogenic effect on normal premenopausal breast. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 1999;84:4017-24.
  9. Sartippour MR, Rao JY, Apple S, et al. A pilot clinical study of short-term isoflavone supplements in breast cancer patients. Nutr Cancer. 2004;49:59-65.
  10. Palomares MR, Hopper L, Goldstein L, Lehman CD, Storer BE, Gralow JR. Effect of soy isoflavones on breast proliferation in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treatment. 2004;88 (Suppl 1):4002 (Abstract).
  11. Cheng G, Wilczek B, Warner M, Gustafsson JA, Landgren BM. Isoflavone treatment for acute menopausal symptoms. Menopause. 2007;14:468-73.
  12. Khan SA, Chatterton RT, Michel N, et al. Soy isoflavone supplementation for breast cancer risk reduction: A randomized phase II trial. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012;5:309-19.
  13. Shike M, Doane AS, Russo L, et al. The effects of soy supplementation on gene expression in breast cancer: a randomized placebo-controlled study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106.
  14. Chi F, Wu R, Zeng YC, Xing R, Liu Y, Xu ZG. Post-diagnosis soy food intake and breast cancer survival: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:2407-12.
  15. EFSA ANS Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food), 2015. Scientific opinion on the risk assessment for peri- and post-menopausal women taking food supplements containing isolated isoflavones. EFSA J. 2015;13:4246 (342 pp).
Dr. Mark Messina

Author Dr. Mark Messina

PhD in Nutrition, Executive Director, Soy Nutrition Institute. Expert in soyfoods and isoflavones.

More posts by Dr. Mark Messina

Leave a Reply